choof.org
Welcome to choof.org. Unfair. Unbalanced.
Trent
Reznor
Nine Inch Nails
Emma
Goldman
Emma Goldman
Che
Guevara
Che Guevara
James
Joyce
James Joyce
Huey
Newton
To Die for the People
Ride the
clipper
The Sexist Clipper
Adbusters Adbusters
Buy! Shop!
UGA SGA
Archive
UGA SGA
An
Organization
Archive
An Organization
E-mail
Chris
E-mail Chris

More Links

Reenhead
Memepool
Robot Wisdom
Daily Rotten
Boing Boing
Politechbot
Declan's Pics
Cryptome
Richard Stallman
Seth Schoen
Earth Liberation Front
Lisa Rein's Radar
How Appealing
Stay Free
Mary Hodder
Bad Ads Weblog
Commercial Alert
Ponderance
Adrian Pritchett
Jenny Toomey
Simson Garfinkel

Archive

December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004












Choof.org "News"

September 16, 2004

Defeat Photo Radar/Red Light With a Spray

The Washington Post reported back in July about a spray that apparently reflects the flash that photo radar/red light cameras use:

Former Baltimore police officer Bob Kleebauer conducted his own road test. Late one night in March, he drove to the intersection where his wife got a photo-radar ticket. His license plate coated with PhotoBlocker, he waited until no cars were coming, then ran the light.

He took that "$75 chance" because he believes red-light cameras are
revenue traps targeting decent people, says Kleebauer, now a telecom
salesman. "Ninety-nine percent of the drivers who get caught are
law-abiding citizens who do it accidentally. You are approaching a
yellow light and you have a tenth of a second to brake or go. Make
the wrong decision and they got you."




His test finding: "The flash went off behind me, but I've never
received a ticket."

The Denver Police Department, at the behest of Fox News, conducted a
road test two years ago and found that PhotoBlocker was effective,
plate covers less so. Similar results were found by TV news programs
in Great Britain, Australia and Sweden.


[...]

Ray "Radar Ray" Reyer, whose online firm Radarbuster.com sells Photo Fog and PhotoStopper, says roadside and weather conditions and camera angles can affect clarity. And the "flash-back" sprays have no effect against digital cameras that don't flash, like the ones Howard County recently began installing.

[...]

Speed Measurement Laboratories -- consultants to police departments
and radar and radar-detector makers worldwide -- has tested most
products designed to defeat photo enforcement, including car waxes
and stealth sprays that claim to make cars "invisible to radar,"
photo-flash devices designed to flash back at cameras and the
high-gloss tag sprays.




"There's a lot of good people in the industry who are honest and a
lot of charlatans. But it doesn't work, that's the bottom line,"
says Carl Fors, owner of the Fort Worth company.

The bounce-back-the-flash concept does work sometimes, he says, but
only on positive images traffic cameras produce. "If we reverse the
image, go to a negative image, we can read every letter on a license
plate," he says.


Fors says the firms that make and operate radar camera systems and
analyze the photos for municipalities routinely check negatives
where license plates look unreadable. "Going to the negative image
is no big deal," he says.


Posted by chris at September 16, 2004 01:39 PM

Comments

Post a comment















Archive | Pictures

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.11