choof.org

Choof.org is Chris Hoofnagle's personal site. You'll find postings from the Federal Register here, interesting Washington regulation tidbits, and my newest feature, the Daily Data Marketing Wake Up Call. Enjoy.

Fam

Father Jay
Mother Cheryl
Brother Holden
Brother Mark
Reenhead (soon to be fam)

Friends

Dan Solove
Laura Quilter's Derivative Work
Mary Hodder's Napsterization
Carrie McLaren's Stay Free
Lauren Gelman's Gelman Blog
Jennifer Granick
Declan
Milana

Decent Links

Hoofnagle Del.icio.us
Utility Fog Blog
Berkeley IP Weblog
Joe Gratz
Memepool
Robot Wisdom
Cryptome
Seth Schoen
Simson Garfinkel
Corporate Crime Reporter
Modern Drunkard Magazine
Divinest Sense
Adam Shostack's Emergent Chaos
Ryan Singel's Secondary Screening

Archive

July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004












Syndicate This!

RSS 1
RSS 2
RSD

Categories

Art (3)
Cards (9)
Commercialism (43)
Consultants (2)
Customer No Service (1)
Degrading Women (1)
Drunk (9)
Federal Register (5)
First Amendment (9)
Health Code Violations (2)
Human Rights (5)
Jeebus (17)
Lysenkonomics (6)
Marketing (40)
Music (5)
News (223)
Privacy (33)
SUV (5)
Samuelson (1)
Scams (1)
Whoredom (31)



















September 23, 2004

Product Placement

Check out today's Wall Street Journal for an article on television product placement. Just this week, Commercial Alert sent a letter signed by journalism professors across the nation urging magazine publishers to adopt rules against product placement in magazines. The letter sums up the problem caused by the advertising industry--that it has no borders, and must become more and more invasive in order to remain profitable:

Magazine editors in the U.S. are under increasing pressure to weave advertising into their editorial content. In the past, advertisers have sought to influence stories, often with success. Now they are going further, and seeking to turn ads into articles.

[...]

In recent months, publications such as the Wall Street Journal, Advertising Age, PR Week and the Christian Science Monitor have reported on how advertisers are leaning on editors to blend advertising with editorial content. This is part of broader efforts by advertisers to increase the impact of their advertising spending. Other media – especially television, movies and video games -- have acceded to advertisers demands for more product placements.

Now advertisers are trying to gain similar concessions from magazines, too. “The only way we’re going to be more successful is to get even more creative and try to find ways to address this church-and-state,” meaning the high wall between advertising and editorial, Matthew Spahn, director of media planning at Sears, Roebuck, told Advertising Age.

Now the Wall Street Journal article demonstrates the situation in the television world, where it is sounding more and more like programming is a commercial itself:

In a scene last season on the WB network comedy, the show's star, Amanda Bynes, is eating a bowl of the Kraft Foods Inc. cereal when her sister, played by Jennie Garth, pushes her out of the kitchen.

"I want to sit at a table like a mature adult and eat my Fruity Pebbles," exclaims a frustrated Ms. Bynes. Several minutes later, Ms. Garth yells, "Your Fruity Pebbles are on my folder."

[...]

The 45-year-old Ms. Ganguzza, who counts P&G rival Unilever as one of her clients, isn't the only one feeling the pinch. As consumers increasingly tune out conventional TV commercials, marketers are scrambling to embed their products in the programming itself. As a result, big ad firms, media buyers, talent agencies and entertainment-marketing start-ups are piling into the product-placement field, muscling aside the tiny firms like Ms. Ganguzza's that have dominated it for decades.

[...]

Independent product placers like AIM, of Astoria, N.Y., make money by charging marketers annual fees ranging from about $20,000 to $80,000 or more to get products on a program's set or into the hands of a show's actors. TV-show staffers get the products in exchange for the possibility -- but not a guarantee -- of airtime. In exchange for her retainer, Ms. Ganguzza guarantees her clients a minimum of five placements a year, but last year one client got 68.

These days, firms that buy ad time are trying to include product placements in their ad deals with networks. For example, Havas SA's MPG media-buying arm is placing Tyson Foods Inc.'s chicken nuggets on a coming episode of "Still Standing" on CBS, as part of a big airtime package it bought from CBS parent ViacomInc. that also included traditional commercials and a sponsorship deal.

[...]

But such arrangements could end up costing TV and cable networks big money, because media-buying firms, ad shops or talent agencies, property masters say, are less likely to do them the kind of favors that the small independents do all the time. "Product-placement companies are saving us thousands of dollars," says Mel Cooper, a set decorator on the WB comedy "Grounded for Life," adding, "Some sets need $20,000 worth of products."

Sabrina Wright, who was property master on "Sex and the City," agrees. "I would set my budget at $15,000 for episode and I would only spend $6,000 because I could get that many products for free through product-placement firms," says Ms. Wright, who had Ms. Ganguzza's help in finding everything from a crib to empty bottles of the wrinkle fighter Botox. "Without companies like AIM, I would have never come in under budget."

Posted by chris at September 23, 2004 09:09 AM

Comments

"rules against product placement in magazines"?!?! Sheesh! Conceptually that's a fine idea, I guess, but there are a godawful lot of magazines that could easily be re-titled "check out the new ______s", where you can fill in the blank with "computer", "car", "music gizmo", etc. Pick up a copy of _Stuff_ sometime (wear gloves if necessary) -- about 50% of its content is "neat new gadgets": video games, cameras, cell phones, what-have-you. Aside from demolishing the Raison D'etre for these publications, it's also gonna kill them financially if their ad revenue falls off.

Posted by: Craig at September 26, 2004 08:24 PM
Post a comment














Search this site:

Match case Regex search

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.17