Welcome to choof.org. Unfair. Unbalanced. |
More Links Reenhead
Archive
July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 February 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 October 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 |
Choof.org Monthly Archive Interfection = American Online "Ah, a web of lies." Have you ever seen "Interfection," the episode of Aqua Teen Hunger Force where the computer internet service provider takes over the house with pop up ads and the occupants cannot cancel the service? Isn't this episode about AOL? Check out part of the transcript: Internet wizard: [I am] the www.yzzerdd, the "Wizard," dot com... Fry Man: What the hell do you want with us?... Internet wizard: Why don't you fill this out, you could win a Porsche? Fry Man: I'm not filling out no damn form so I can win no damn sports car. I want to know what the hell is going on here... Internet wizard: Congratulations, you are automatically signed up to receive e-mails about updates, specials and e-mails about other e-mails! Fry Man: ...I'm coming in there to unsubscribe... Internet wizard: It's only 44.95 a month, that's pennies a day...Surely this convenience entices you. Pornography and online gaming at hundreds of times the speed of your normal advertising service provider. It's so easy to use. And the surgery to implant it at the base of your skull is so painless that it's no wonder I'm number one... Fry Man: ...Now I know for sure that I don't want this service. Internet wizard: You signed up for the thirty day trial. You must have to have it for thirty days... Fry Man: ...You're going offline, Internet Wizard... Internet wizard: Fine, fine, don't use our service. Get left in the digital dust, but remember, you could have won a Porsche. Fry Man: [Looking at popup windows options] Yes! Sign me up for your fabulous and invasive service, including the home invasion cam!...No, I need another 90 days to decide, but I'm pretty sure I want this. Internet wizard: And after this 90 day trial, you will be judged and sentenced to a lifetime of interactive sports, news and information. And we will continue to draw from your account, because banks don't care. It's not their money... WP Editorial on Intelligent Design The Washington Post's institutional editorials (the ones written by the newspaper's editors) are usually so middle of the road and cautious that they often appear naive or not well informed. The editorial writers often appear fooled by those "slick web sites" and "public relations" so often used to sway opinion. Today, when I saw the editorial titled "God and Darwin" below, I thought that it would say something like, "a balance could be struck between intelligent design and evolution." But no, they came down strongly on the right side of something. For once. Good job, Fred Hiatt. WITH THEIR SLICK Web sites, pseudo-academic conferences and savvy public relations, the proponents of "intelligent design" -- a "theory" that challenges the validity of Darwinian evolution -- are far more sophisticated than the creationists of yore. Rather than attempt to prove that the world was created in six days, they operate simply by casting doubt on evolution, largely using the time-honored argument that intelligent life could not have come about by a random natural process and must have been the work of a single creator. They do no experiments and do not publish in recognized scientific journals. Nevertheless, this new generation of anti-evolutionists, arguing that children have a "right to question" scientific truths, has had widespread success in undermining evolutionary theory. Vending Hot Dogs, American Women Elsewhere in the Post, one will find this gem: FBI and Department of Homeland Security officers have arrested an Egyptian man who allegedly ran a business from a hot dog cart on 17th and L streets NW that provided American brides for Middle Eastern men seeking green cards, officials said yesterday. Pissing in the Wind The Washington Post covers a meeting of some inaugural protestors: Inside protest headquarters, up a flight of stairs from a discount tire shop on New York Avenue, a recent coordinating meeting veered toward chaos. Yeah, they can't stop you, but they sure as hell won't be listening. The End of Autonomous Content is at Hand Someday, there will be no content. There will only be advertising. The Wall Street Journal tells us: ...Product placement has been around for years, but now the practice is growing rapidly in daytime television. Butterball turkeys, Nascar shirts and Kleenex tissue have all taken recent star turns. Not only do the characters on "All My Children" smell good, but they also have been swilling a lot of Florida orange juice -- and not because they're thirsty. A couple of observations: -Product placement started as the intentional presence of recognizable items in the background or in an actor's hands, now it's beginning to control the actual dialogue. As far as I am concerned, there is no end in sight. No amount of promotion is too much. Expect for the entire show to be based around a product before too long. -Note how soap opera viewers are guinea pigs for this type of advertising. It is not popularly understood that the limits of consumer acceptance are actually tested. Companies will test different versions of a product to see how far they can go in limiting features (so that they can be sold as premium services) before people revolt. So it's not the best product at the lowest cost. It's the most profit maximization keyed to the limits of consumer acceptance. Region Coding Limiting Products Another beauty from the Journal. ...Some consumer-electronics companies are designing products so they will work only in the U.S. For example, some of the latest printers from Hewlett-Packard Co. refuse to print if they aren't fed ink cartridges bought in the same region of the world as the printer. Nintendo Co.'s latest hand-held game machines are sold in the U.S. with power adaptors that don't work in Europe. Banks Negotiating Auto Loan Discrimination Cases The Wall Street Journal reports that the big banks are in talks with attorneys in auto-lending discrimination cases. These are cases where auto dealers "pack" financial products with extra charges. For instance, if you go buy a car from a dealership and the manufacturer offers you financing, the dealer will quietly add a couple of percentage points of interest to the loan. Over the terms of the loan, this adds up big time, resulting in thousands of dollars in interest and fees. Banks allow the additional interest charges, thus enabling dealers to rip people off: "Both Bank One and Bank of America allow dealers to tack on as much as three percentage points to the annual percentage rate the banks would offer the consumer based on creditworthiness." The suits allege that blacks were disproportionately targeted for this practice: "A study used by plaintiffs in another suit found that African-American car buyers paid loan markups averaging $1,229 each. The average for white car buyers with similar credit histories was $867 a loan." Generally, you're targeted if you are not an informed buyer. Simply put, when buying a car, you should go get a loan directly from a credit union or bank. If you get it from the dealer, they will find a way to screw you. Note this aspect of the case--Bank of America claims that they don't discriminate; that they only have access to credit scores rather than race: "Bank of America spokeswoman Shirley Norton also acknowledged the bank is "in talks" regarding their case, but declined to characterize the talks as settlement talks or indicate how far along the discussions are. 'We don't discriminate. Our policies are racially neutral, based on credit scores,' she said. 'We don't have access to the customers, and we don't deal directly with the customer.'" But this begs the question--are the credit scores themselves discriminatory? Consultant Screw Ups I've decided to add a new section to my blog to cover consultant screw ups. Do you have any idea how much of your tax money is wasted on consultants who build $100M computer systems that don't work. Well, you're going to find out. Here's the first article. CNN reports: A $170 million computer overhaul intended to give FBI agents and analysts an instantaneous and paperless way to manage criminal and terrorism cases is headed back to the drawing board, probably at a much steeper cost to taxpayers. Stay tuned for more incompetence. MS Unable to Develop Consumer Friendly Products I've said it before, I'll say it again: Microsoft is not in a position to create consumer-oriented products because the company is too tied to the advertising industry. Remember how long it took Microsoft to create reasonable cookie handling tools in IE? Remember how long it took Microsoft to block popups in IE? Both delays are the result of the company being too tied to advertising revenue. They don't want to give consumers the tools they need to make the web friendlier. In today's Wall Street Journal, Walt Mossberg reveals the newest insult to our privacy brought to us by Microsoft. Unlike all the other spyware programs out there, Microsoft's one does not eliminate third-party tracking cookies. Now, why would Microsoft do that? It's because Microsoft's software is designed for advertisers, not for you. The software offers two kinds of scans: a quick, five-minute version, and a longer version that took about half an hour on my test machine. But the scans missed some spyware found by Spy Sweeper. In particular, Microsoft missed "tracking cookies," small files deposited by Web companies, often without your knowledge or permission, that track your online activities. The Microsoft program deliberately doesn't look for these. Microsoft officials say they are concerned that some legitimate cookies, such as those that store Web-site login information, could be unfairly labeled as spyware. They promise to add tracking-cookie detection in the future. Food Industry Lobbying a Part of Dietary Guidelines The Wall Street Journal continues to amaze me. Where else can you routinely read about big business' influence over government? It could really give one a jaded view of life! Anyway, today's article of interest is on the dietary guidelines, the advice our government gives us on food and exercise: ...The new guidelines arrive after a year of research by a government-appointed advisory panel, intense food-industry lobbying and extensive comment from the public. The guidelines, which hew closely to the draft put out by the advisory panel in August, are the basis for the school lunch and other federal food programs, and are widely hoped to be a vehicle for stemming America's growing problem of obesity... Corporate Governance Movement Creates Its Own Scandal Mark points us to this institutional oped at the New York Times: If there is any upside to the forced resignation of Florencio López-de-Silanes from his post as director of Yale's International Institute for Corporate Governance, it is this: corporate governance, a relatively obscure issue a few years ago, has now grown big enough to generate its own scandals Radio Attacks XM, Sirius The Washington Post reports that traditional terrestrial radio stations are attacking satellite radio companies XM and Sirius. The radio industry plans to promote itself in coming weeks via a string of high-profile print and on-air ads featuring testimonials from music stars such as Nelly, Alicia Keys and Ludacris, as the medium finds itself the latest of a number of aging industries fighting back against new-tech rivals. The Wall Street Journal reports: Radio executives long have dismissed satellite radio, playing down its threat on the theory that few people would want to pay for something they're used to getting free. But that line is getting harder and harder to swallow. There's a few flaws in this campaign. First, I'm not convinced that those interested in XM and Sirius would be interested in Nelly, Alicia Keys, Ludacris, and Avril Lavinge. Second, broadcast (some satellite radio also has terrestrial transmitters) radio isn't "free," it's burdened with constant crass commercialism and endless commercials. Third, the new stuff argument…there has to be more new stuff on satellite. Use of "Hoodie, " "Scrunchie" Before 1990 Here's one for T & S: The Oxford English Dictionary is seeking an example of the use of the word "hoodie" before 1990 and "scrunchie" before 1989: Words or phrases which appear on the Appeals List are those currently being drafted or revised for the OED for which the documentary evidence is incomplete. Often these are slang or colloquial items which cannot be researched in specialist texts and are most likely to be found by a general reader in non-specialized or popular literature... This and other interesting word news appears in the OED Newsletter. Ain't No Party Like a Sally Party Because A Sally Party Don't Stop! Ads in Movie Theaters Gary Ruskin asks: Are you tired of being held hostage at the movie theater? Take action by sending a message to movie theater owners. One site estimates that the ads only give theaters 18 cents per viewer. Isn't your time worth more than that? Pipeline Workers Test Positive for Drugs .83% While marine crewmembers are testing positive for drugs 2% of the time, pipeline workers are at less than 1%. 2% of CrewmenTest Positive for Drugs A notice in the Federal Register explains: "...the Coast Guard requires marine employers to establish random drug testing programs for covered crewmembers on inspected and uninspected vessels. All marine employers are required to collect and maintain a record of drug testing program data for each calendar year..." In 2003, 2.07% of covered crewmembers tested positive for drugs in random screens. What is a "oovered crewmember?" I'm not sure. They seem to be defined by function.
Powered
by |